| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Josef Djugashvilis
2921
   |
Posted - 2015.03.22 09:19:36 -
[1] - Quote
AFK cloaking should be nerfed just as soon as someone can show how an afk cloaker can hurt anyone.
This is not a signature.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
2924
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 09:25:37 -
[2] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:AFK cloaking should be nerfed just as soon as someone can show how an afk cloaker can hurt anyone. Pretending you don't understand the problem doesn't make the problem go away. Its like saying hibernating bears are not dangerous because they're hibernating. ******** point of view to take isn't it.
The title of the thread is to do with afk cloaking.
My argument stands.
Pretending that an afk cloaker is a problem is nonsense.
afk cannot harm anyone.
Player is at the keyboard in a cloaked ship, valid style of gameplay.
This is not a signature.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
2925
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 13:44:05 -
[3] - Quote
Demica Diaz wrote:Has anyone actually lost something to AFK cloakers?
Balls.
This is not a signature.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
2926
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 07:55:25 -
[4] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:AFK cloaking should be nerfed just as soon as someone can show how an afk cloaker can hurt anyone. Pretending you don't understand the problem doesn't make the problem go away. Its like saying hibernating bears are not dangerous because they're hibernating. ******** point of view to take isn't it. The title of the thread is to do with afk cloaking. My argument stands. Pretending that an afk cloaker is a problem is nonsense. afk cannot harm anyone. Player is at the keyboard in a cloaked ship, valid style of gameplay. Weapons do not do any harm you know? It's people who use weapons to harm other people. So why not sell weapons to everyone in any supermarket? Your logic
Sorry, but your response is your, well, Iogic, not mine.
If a miner is afk and gets ganked it is his fault for being afk, if the same player is afk in a cloaked ship he is now a threat?
Weird.
This is not a signature.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
2927
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 16:28:32 -
[5] - Quote
Lordy, this thread is still going.
If CCP do nerf cloaking, some folk will complain.
If CCP do not nerf cloaking, some folk will complain.
My persoanl preference is to leave cloaking alone as it enables the little folk like my good self to have an economic impact on my enemies.
A sort of David and Goliath scenario.
That so many folk can be so scared of one ship amuses me no end.
This is not a signature.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
2927
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 07:23:17 -
[6] - Quote
Nina Lowel wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Lordy, this thread is still going.
If CCP do nerf cloaking, some folk will complain.
If CCP do not nerf cloaking, some folk will complain.
My persoanl preference is to leave cloaking alone as it enables the little folk like my good self to have an economic impact on my enemies.
A sort of David and Goliath scenario.
That so many folk can be so scared of one ship amuses me no end. Yes, 1 person deserves to be able to shut down a system in low time zones. If you want to fight and you're active and dodging scans, fine, you should have no problem. AFK in space? You're dead like you should be, like everyone else.
I have never ever been afk and left a ship in space.
I dock up even for bio breaks.
But I do love scaring the bejasus out of folk with one ship.
This is not a signature.
|
| |
|